Monday, March 2, 2015
2A
As seen in Twelve Angry Men the jurors took a substantial amount of time to conclude if the boy was guilty or not guilty. Since the boys life was on the line they new to be thorough and analyze every detail possible. If the jurors would have rushed the decision process then the would have declared an innocent boy guilty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like how you include the amount of time required and needed to discover the outcome of the case. I also like how you include how the jurors go deeply into the case and analyze it because the boys life is at stake.
ReplyDeleteI agree. The jurors definitely had to take lots of time to decide if the boy was guilty or not because if they would have just decided with in a few minutes they would have never figured out all the little details involving the witnesses, they probably would have just taken the word of what the witnesses claimed to see and been done right then and there. So yes I agree if the jurors would have rushed the decision process they would have declared an innocent boy guilty.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the time spent on the case was a very important aspect. Although they spent time going through the evidence, they could have gone even more in depth. While I agree with the verdict, there were a couple of situations that caused me to question it. The old mans time, for example, was way off from what he said, but it did match up with the possible murder. Issues like that may have caused a change in the verdict if they were looked into more.
ReplyDelete