Monday, March 2, 2015
4A
Assertiveness and reason can be powerful when used correctly. When Juror 8 used both of these tactics it worked in his favor. The others jurors that tried these same tactics ended up failing because they contradicted themselves or Juror 8 contradicted them. Other jurors, like Juror 3, got too emotional when discussing their arguments. In Act Three, "How do you know what she saw? Maybe she's far-sighted...How does he know all these things" (Rose 62). Juror 3 lost whatever kind of argument he was going to create when he got too emotional. He was more angry at Juror 8 not voting the same way as him, that he lost his argument.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You make a very good point, the reasoning that juror 8 did brought out a lot of truth in the case, and the other jurors assertiveness was backfires when juror 8 reasoned against them. Juror 8 asserted himself as a fighter, and didn't give up when he was made out to be and antagonist.
ReplyDelete