Monday, March 2, 2015
5A
There are multiple interpretations of facts. This can be seen in the play when juror 8 is bringing the point up that the elderly man's testimony might not have been as accurate as he had said. Throughout the play, each jurors take on the facts opened up new views for the jury to deliberate from as they tried to put together what happened. Some of they other jurors, such as number 3, refused to believe what most of the other jurors thought because he did not view what the others firmly believed, as facts. Due to the fact that people read facts differently, not all jurors saw all of the evidence as solid. They each painted their own conclusions based on which of the pieces of evidence they viewed as facts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree. In the story, people interpret the facts in many different ways. People refused to believe the facts that others had presented simply because they did not think them to be actually true. If people have different interpretations of facts, people will never come to a conclusion about said facts.
ReplyDelete