Thursday, February 26, 2015
6A
Test others opinions, question their assumptions, and draw your own conclusions. In the play Twelve Angry Men only one juror believed that there was some reasonable doubt to the boys guilt. Juror number 8 stood alone and slowly changed the all others minds. They all tested the facts from the witnesses and came up with many ways to prove that their testimonies were not 100% accurate. In the end, all the other jurors could see that there really was reasonable doubt and decided that he was not guilty, all because they decided to prove the facts instead of just believing them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with this. Juror 8 was testing the others opinions, questioning their assumptions and drawing his own conclusions, which lead him to convincing the others to his side. I agree with the evidence you used to show how he tested, questioned and drew his own conclusions. It all makes sense on how he was able to convince the jurors that the kid was innocent.
ReplyDelete