Friday, February 27, 2015

6A

One determined and skilled individual can wield a lot of influence. This is obvious in the Twelve Angry Men. Juror eight is the only one questioning whether or not the boy is guilty, even though the other eleven jurors are convinced he is guilty. Juror eight continuously makes key points of evidence and witnesses statements that do not add up in the case. Juror eight chose his words carefully and he was able to gradually convince the other jurors to agree with his opinion.
Posted by at

3 comments:

  1. AnonymousMarch 2, 2015 at 5:21 PM

    I agree. juror 8 kept on pursuing his idea and convinced everybody to be on his side at the end.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousMarch 2, 2015 at 7:15 PM

    I do agree mostly with your statement, but I aslo think Juror 8 used the tactic of frustrating his co-jurors into agreeing with him. I think part of his goal was to make them feel foolish.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMarch 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM

    I agree! Juror 8 influenced the other jurors in such a clever and patient manner that eventually resulted with the jury on his side.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)