Sunday, March 1, 2015
2A
Getting to the bottom of a complex issue takes a lot of time effort. In the play the "Twelve Angry Men" each of the jurors have there own personality which makes it very hard for them to all agree on something. At first all of the jurors just wanted to vote guilty due to there biased opinions. Juror 8 was the only juror that believed there was reasonable doubt. He explained his reasoning to everyone even though he stood alone, but all of his time and effort payed off when in the end he managed to change all of the jurors votes to not guilty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It can be very difficult to have everyone agree on something, when people have very closed minds. Making a decision that has to do with someone's life should be very thought out and judged fairly. Most jurors had their minds made up and were willing to say their verdict with little to no collaboration. Luckily Juror 8 was willing to take all the time in order to give the boy the fairness he deserved.
ReplyDeleteBeing biased and having biased opinions did have an impact on the trial but I agree, that when juror 8 stood his ground that they began to make progress towards the truth and uncovering what realy happened
ReplyDelete